This is the statement issued by the Obama
Administration (PDF) regarding proposed Cyber Intelligence
Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA). Perry4Law
and Perry4Law
Techno
Legal Base (PTLB) wish to share the same with all the
stakeholders.
The Administration is committed to
increasing
public-private sharing of information about cybersecurity threats as
an essential part of comprehensive legislation to protect the
Nation's vital information systems and critical infrastructure. The
sharing of information must be conducted in a manner that preserves
Americans' privacy, data confidentiality, and civil liberties and
recognizes the civilian nature of cyberspace. Cybersecurity and
privacy are not mutually exclusive. Moreover, information sharing,
while an essential component of comprehensive legislation, is not
alone enough to protect the Nation's core critical infrastructure
from cyber threats. Accordingly, the Administration strongly opposes
H.R. 3523, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, in its
current form.
H.R. 3523 fails to provide authorities
to ensure
that the Nation's core critical infrastructure is protected while
repealing important provisions of electronic surveillance law without
instituting corresponding privacy, confidentiality, and civil
liberties safeguards. For example, the bill would allow broad sharing
of information with governmental entities without establishing
requirements for both industry and the Government to minimize and
protect personally identifiable information. Moreover, such sharing
should be accomplished in a way that permits appropriate sharing
within the Government without undue restrictions imposed by private
sector companies that share information.
The bill also lacks sufficient
limitations on the
sharing of personally identifiable information between private
entities and does not contain adequate oversight or accountability
measures necessary to ensure that the data is used only for
appropriate purposes. Citizens have a right to know that corporations
will be held legally accountable for failing to safeguard personal
information adequately. The Government, rather than establishing a
new antitrust exemption under this bill, should ensure that
information is not shared for anti-competitive purposes.
In addition, H.R. 3523 would
inappropriately shield
companies from any suits where a company's actions are based on cyber
threat information identified, obtained, or shared under this bill,
regardless of whether that action otherwise violated Federal criminal
law or results in damage or loss of life. This broad liability
protection not only removes a strong incentive to improving
cybersecurity, it also potentially undermines our Nation's economic,
national security, and public safety interests.
H.R. 3523 effectively treats domestic
cybersecurity
as an intelligence activity and thus, significantly departs from
longstanding efforts to treat the Internet and cyberspace as civilian
spheres. The Administration believes that a civilian agency – the
Department of Homeland Security – must have a central role in
domestic cybersecurity, including for conducting and overseeing the
exchange of cybersecurity information with the private sector and
with sector-specific Federal agencies.
The American people expect their
Government to
enhance security without undermining their privacy and civil
liberties. Without clear legal protections and independent oversight,
information sharing legislation will undermine the public's trust in
the Government as well as in the Internet by undermining fundamental
privacy, confidentiality, civil liberties, and consumer protections.
The Administration's draft legislation, submitted last May, provided
for information sharing with clear privacy protections and strong
oversight by the independent Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight
Board.
The Administration's proposal also
provided
authority for the Federal Government to ensure that the Nation's
critical infrastructure operators are taking the steps necessary to
protect the American people. The Congress must also include
authorities to ensure our Nation's most vital critical infrastructure
assets are properly protected by meeting minimum cybersecurity
performance standards. Industry would develop these standards
collaboratively with the Department of Homeland Security. Voluntary
measures alone are insufficient responses to the growing danger of
cyber threats.
Legislation should address core
critical
infrastructure vulnerabilities without sacrificing the fundamental
values of privacy and civil liberties for our citizens, especially at
a time our Nation is facing challenges to our economic well-being and
national security. The Administration looks forward to continuing to
engage with the Congress in a bipartisan, bicameral fashion to enact
cybersecurity legislation to address these critical issues. However,
for the reasons stated herein, if H.R. 3523 were presented to the
President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill
No comments:
Post a Comment